This book was another book club choice. Unfortunately, I am the only person in our group of 7 that actually finished it – ha. So, our discussion was rather one-sided. The book wasn’t bad, it just took awhile to get through. I have never been very interested in African history, but reading this book definitely got me interested in learning more, and I think that makes it worth it.
The story revolves around a missionary family, the Price’s, who move to the Congo on a mission in 1959. It is narrated by the five women of the family - the mother, Orleanna and 4 daughters, Rachel, Leah, Adah and Ruth May, all of whom seem ill-equipped to handle the harsh conditions and cultural differences of Africa.
The patriarch, Nathan Price, is portrayed as a bullying, self-righteous preacher who tries desperately to convert the natives of the Congo to Christianity. Throughout the novel, the girls begin to learn more about the political upheaval in the Congo and start to question their father’s stubborn efforts to save the souls of the natives. Eventually, the political instability in the Congo clashes with the father’s mission, and the tragic consequences that result split the family. From that point on, we follow the girls as they grow and change over a period of 30 years.
I recently read an excerpt from Kingsolver that I think explains one of the purposes of the novel that I really enjoyed. The book is meant to be a political allegory, comparing the events of the characters’ lives to the larger world events. The Price’s, in particular Nathan Price, went into Africa with their ideas and beliefs about religion, politics, culture, etc., the same way the US and Europe went into Africa and other developing countries imposing their beliefs, certain that they were right. We, as US citizens, didn’t make the decisions our government imposed on Africa. We are just innocent observers, like the Price daughters were with their father.
And that idea brings up my favorite part of the novel, which was the last chapter told from Adah’s perspective. She discusses the balance of nature and life, and the African word muntu, a word that encompasses all being - past, present and future, living, dead, and yet unborn. I’ll leave you with a few excerpts from that chapter.
“The carrying capacity for humans is limited. History holds all things in the balance, including large hopes and short lives. When Albert Schweitzer walked into the jungle… he meant to save every child, thinking Africa would then learn how to have fewer children. But when families have spent a million years making nine in the hopes of saving one, they cannot stop making nine… Poor Africa. No other continent has endured such an unspeakably bizarre combination of foreign thievery and foreign goodwill… Africa has a thousand ways of cleansing itself… If you could for a moment rise up out of your own beloved skin and appraise ant, human, and virus as equally resourceful beings, you might admire the accord they have all struck in Africa.”
Overall, I think Kingsolver accomplished something that she must have set out to do – to tell a story of Africa and try to get the world to see Africa in a different light. Did it get a little too political in the last third of the book? Maybe. But this is still a novel, and it certainly causes you to think and want to learn the facts of that history.